Community: the Dynamics of Generating Awesome

Image of community

Learners go farther when they learn together.

The way we see it, any online learning experience consists of three parts:

  • Social presence (that you have a crew & we’re in it together)
  • Cognitive presence (ideas & content)
  • Teaching presence (feedback & questions)

The way those pieces work together looks like this:

Venn diagram showing the intersection of social presence, cognitive presence and teaching presence.

In this part of the course, we’ll talk about “social presence” (or community), and how to build one around your learning goals.

What Does a Learning Community Look Like?

Dave Cormier, lead raconteur for the online course Rhizomatic Learning: the Community is the Curriculum (#rhizo14) and reluctant stepfather of the MOOC movement, answers the following core questions:

  • Why is learning in community important?
  • How do you ask people to participate?
  • How did you build with your audience?

Why does Community Matter for Learning?

Diversity of perspectives. As Dave said, books are inert objects. Pushing “play” on a video is one passive experience. When you engage ideas with other people, the dialogue and exchanges challenge you to look at things several different ways. We won’t tell you what to think–engaging others helps us think uniquely and engage collaboratively.

Support and stretching. When you find your learning crew–the folks who share your vision and your values–they can buoy you up when you encounter setbacks and help you set the next goalpost. They can deliver feedback that helps you hone in on weaknesses or develop strengths.

OK, But What Is Community?

Let’s ask around:

Scholar and writer Clay Shirky, in describing how the open source community Perl works described his litmus test:

shirky community.png

Communities also provide a sense of interconnectedness. Community designer Alex Hillman shows how important it is to design for deep, trusting interactions, because they create value for the participants:

hillman community.png

At P2PU, we describe community as a combination of the above. For us, community is a sense of shared purpose and belonging.

P2PU community.png

Think about your local PTA, block party organization, church, book club or alumni association. You participate for a reason, and when you’re there, you have a sense that you’re included.

As a course facilitator, you are designing a learning community. Peer-to-peer learning is a network of people helping each other. Once you have your learning goals established, the next series of ideas to think about is how to build a community around those goals.

How Do I Design a Community?

Good question. In order to design a stellar learning community, you’ll need to think through a few questions. In your course, how will you:

Ask learners to participate?

Often at P2PU learners and facilitators design the course together. We’ve already mentioned collaborative goal-setting, and asking for input or feedback on the course design is a great first step.

Welcome new members to the community?

We like to ask folks to introduce themselves on community.p2pu.org. We build social presence by asking people a bit about their personality and their background:

Image of discourse forum

Celebrate successes?

Each community has their own rituals to recognize success (think about work anniversaries, juried art shows, ribbon-cutting ceremonies, etc.) These activities build a shared sense of quality in a community–they provide models for what is imporant, what individual members should strive to produce, what good collaborations might look like. Thinking about what you value and measure is important in community design.

Some examples:

P2PU School of Ed.

In 2011, Karen Fasimpaur was looking to experiment with teacher professional development. She wanted to focus on inquiry, self-direction, critical thinking, and collaboration with continuing education that was relevant to the lives of teachers. What came out of her curiosity was the P2PU School of Ed. 30 courses on the p2pu.org platform and two years later, she recommends the following design principles:

First, in our experience, the formation of community has been critical. The social nature of peer learning relies on trust and relationships. This is not something that can be fostered over a few weeks. While this kind of community-building takes time, we are beginning to see some evidence of it at P2PU. In large part this has been due to the ongoing, generous participation of many individuals, as well as organizations such as the National Writing Project. We have benefitted greatly from the participation of their already-existing community of passionate and deep thinking educators who share our values and goals.

We have also learned that peer learning experiences work best when they are designed by the group, not instituted from the top down. This can be challenging to achieve, but the groups that have been co-planned and co-facilitated collaboratively have been most compelling.

Check out the full report at reports.p2pu.org.

Data Explorer Mission

In 2013, P2PU and Open Knowledge teamed up to offer a “Data Explorer Missions” an introduction to working with data over the course of 3 weeks. 151 learners signed up for our initial pilot. After the course ended, we took at look at the engagement metrics—one group (Team 10) cohered quickly and took off like a rocketship. When we looked into their comments to each other, we saw how they built social presence, trust and asked each other to participate.

  • Spontaneous prompts to check in: Members sent short messages to each other to keep the course alive, i.e. “Are you doing alright? Haven’t heard from you in ages” “Just making some noise.”
  • Familiarity: Members referred to each other by name (as opposed to simply “Team 10″) and shared bits of contextual information about their lives, such as when they found time to do the assignments, where they were traveling, etc.
  • Building upon shared interest: Team 10 shared content related to the subject matter of the course that others might find interesting–such as other Data MOOCs, open data released by the White House, etc.
  • Tried new tools together: Members tried out new tools like Google Fusion Tables together, and shared their frustrations, setbacks and successes.
  • Summaries of Hangouts: In a brilliant move, members sent a summary of the synchronous Hangout to the whole group, which kept the folks who couldn’t make it in the loop.

See the full recap at Data MOOC: Results, Findings and Recommendations


Previous section:
Next section: